Thursday, May 03, 2012

 

Merkel's In Hot Water... So No More Bailouts... Sorry Spain


Spain, which is now at the forefront of the Great Western Debt Default Collapse, has opted to seek funding from the mega-bailout fund, the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) rather than going directly to the ECB or the IMF.

The reasons for this are clear: the IMF doesn't have the funds (nor will it as the US won't fund a European bailout during a Presidential election year). And the ECB is now backed into a political corner with Germany.


However, Spain is discovering that even ESM funding doesn't come without strings attached:


Germany Rejects Spain Banks Tapping Bailout Fund, Meister Says


Spain's rating downgrade at Standard & Poor's doesn't alter Germany's stance that banks can't have direct access to Europe's financial backstops, a senior lawmaker from Chancellor Angela Merkel's party said.


"The German position is absolutely strict," Michael Meister, the deputy caucus chairman of Merkel's Christian Democrats, said in a phone interview in Berlin. "And since such aid programs require unanimity, there's not going to be any change. All sorts of people can try to set things in motion, but Germany won't vote for it."


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-27/germany-rejects-spain-banks-tapping-bailout-fund-meister-says.html


The ESM funding idea is really just Spain playing for time (the ESM doesn't actually have the funds to bail Spain out). But the fact that Germany is now making the ESM a political issue indicates the degree to which political relationships are breaking down in the EU. And once the political relationships break down... so will the Euro.


Indeed, Germany has no choice. If it decides to prop up Spain it will receive a ratings downgrade (something which France is about to experience anyway). Europe with a downgraded Germany is not a pretty sight.


Moreover, Germany's decision to prop up the Euro is finally beginning to arouse furor from the German population. In particular, the below story which reveals that Germany has in fact put German taxpayers on the hook for over €2 trillion in back-door EU rescue measures could be the proverbial tipping point that sends German voters over the edge.


German tempers boil over back-door euro rescues


Professor Hans-Werner Sinn, head of Germany's IFO Institute, said German taxpayers are facing a dangerous rise in credit risk from a plethora of bail-out schemes. "The euro-system is near explosion," he told Austria's Economics Academy on Thursday.


Dr Sinn said Germany is on the hook for much of the €2.1 trillion (£1.72 trillion) in rescue measures for EMU debtors - often by the back-door - that will saddle Germans with ruinous losses one day.


"It is a horror scenario," he said, warning that the euro system is splitting friendly countries into blocs of mutually hostile creditors and debtors, exactly the opposite of what was hoped.


Earlier this week, the Foundation for Family Business in Munich filed a criminal lawsuit against the Bundesbank, accusing the board of disguising the true scale of risk born by German citizens.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/9215232/German-tempers-boil-over-back-door-euro-rescues.html


This is the last thing Angela Merkel needs right now. Between this and inflation arising in Germany she's in major political hot water. So expect Germany to push even harder when it comes to fiscal austerity in the future...


On that note, I fully believe the EU in its current form is in its final chapters. Whether it's through Spain imploding or Germany ultimately pulling out of the Euro, we've now reached the point of no return: the problems facing the EU (Spain and Italy) are too large to be bailed out. There simply aren't any funds or entities large enough to handle these issues.

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Monday, April 30, 2012

 

April 30, 2012 The Secrets of the Spanish Banking System That 99% of Analysts Fail to Grasp

 
Spain is a catastrophe on such a level that few analysts even grasp it.
Indeed, to fully understand just why Spain is such a catastrophe, we need to understand Spain in the context of both the EU and the global financial system.
The headline economic data points for Spain are the following:
  • Spain's economy (roughly €1 trillion) is the fourth largest in Europe and the 12th largest in the world.
  • Spain sports an official Debt to GDP of 68% and a Federal Deficit between 5.3-5.8% (as we'll soon find out the official number)
  • Spain's unemployment is currently 24%: the highest in the industrialized world.
  • Unemployment for Spanish youth is 50%+: on par with that of Greece
On the surface, Spain's debt load and deficits aren't too bad. So we have to ask ourselves, "Why is unemployment so high and why are Spanish ten year bills approaching the dreaded 7%?" (the level at which Greece and Portugal began requesting bailouts).
 
The answer to these questions lies within the dirty details of Spain's economic "boom" of the 2000s as well as its banking system.
 
For starters, the Spanish economic boom was a housing bubble fueled by Spain lowering its interest rates in order to enter the EU, not organic economic growth.
Moreover, Spain's wasn't just any old housing bubble; it was a mountain of a property bubble (blue line below) that made the US's (gray line below) look like a small hill in comparison.
spain prop.png
In the US during the boom years, it was common to hear of people quitting their day jobs to go into real estate. In Spain the boom was so dramatic that students actually dropped out of school to work in the real estate sector (hence the sky high unemployment rates for Spanish youth).
 
Spanish students weren't the only ones going into real estate. Between 2000 and 2008, the Spanish population grew from 40 million to 45 million (a whopping 12%) as immigrants flocked to the country to get in on the boom. 
In fact, from 1999 to 2007, the Spanish economy accounted for more than ONE THIRD of all employment growth in the EU.
 
This is Spain, with a population of just 46 million, accounting for OVER ONE THIRD of the employment growth for a region of 490 million people.
This, in of itself, set Spain up for a housing bust/ banking Crisis worse than that which the US faced/continues to face. Indeed, even the headline banking data points for Spain are staggeringly bad:
  • Spanish banks just drew €227 billion from the ECB in March: up almost 50% from its February borrowings
  • Spanish banks account for 29% of total borrowings from the ECB
  • Yields on Spanish ten years are approaching 7%: the tipping point at which Greece and other nations have requested bailouts
As bad as these numbers are, they greatly underestimate just how ugly Spain's banking system is. The reason for this is due to the structure of the Spanish banking industry.
Spain's banking system is split into two tiers: the large banks (Santander, BBVA) and the smaller, more territorial cajas.
The caja system dates back to the 19th century. Cajas at that time were meant to be almost akin to village or rural financial centers. As a result of this, the Spanish country is virtually saturated with them: there is approximately one caja branch for every 1,900 people in Spain. In comparison there is one bank branch for every 3,130 people in the US and one bank branch for every 6,200 people in the UK.
 
Now comes the bad part...
Until recently, the caja banking system was virtually unregulated. Yes, you read that correctly, until about 2010-2011 there were next no regulations for these banks (which account for 50% of all Spanish deposits). 
They didn't have to reveal their loan to value ratios, the quality of collateral they took for making loans... or anything for that matter.
 
As one would expect, during the Spanish property boom, the cajas went nuts lending to property developers. They also found a second rapidly growing group of borrowers in the form of Spanish young adults who took advantage of new low interest rates to start buying property (prior to the housing boom, traditionally Spanish young adults lived with their parents until marriage).
 
In simple terms, from 2000 to 2007, the cajas were essentially an unregulated banking system that leant out money to anyone who wanted to build or buy property in Spain.
 
Things only got worse after the Spanish property bubble peaked in 2007. At a time when the larger Spanish banks such as Santander and BBVA read the writing on the wall and began slowing the pace of their mortgage lending, the cajas went "all in" on the housing market, offering loans to pretty much anyone with a pulse.
 
To give you an idea of how out of control things got in Spain, consider that in 1998, Spanish Mortgage Debt to GDP ratio was just 23% or so. By 2009 it had more than tripled to nearly 70% of GDP. By way of contrast, over the same time period, the US Mortgage Debt to GDP ratio rose from 50% to 90%. Like I wrote before, Spain's property bubble dwarfed the US's in relative terms.
 
The cajas went so crazy lending money post-2007 that by 2009 they owned 56% of all Spanish mortgages. Put another way, over HALF of the Spanish housing bubble was funded by an unregulated banking system that was lending to anyone with a pulse who could sign a contract.
 
Indeed, these banks became so garbage laden that a full 20% of their assets were comprised of loan payments being made by property developers. Mind, you, I'm not referring to the loans themselves (the mortgages); I'm referring to loan payments: the money developers were sending in to the banks.
 
To try and put this into perspective, imagine if Bank of America suddenly announced that 20% of its "assets" were payments being sent in by borrowers to cover mortgage debts. Not Treasuries, not mortgages, not loans... but payments being sent in to the bank on loans and mortgages.
 
This is the REAL problem with Spain's banking system. It's saturated with subprime and sub-subprime loans that were made during one of the biggest housing bubbles in the last 30 years.
Indeed, to give you an idea of how bad things are with the cajas, consider that in February 2011 the Spanish Government implemented legislation demanding all Spanish banks have equity equal to 8% of their "risk-weighted assets." Those banks that failed to meet this requirement had to either merge with larger banks or face partial nationalization.
 
The deadline for meeting this capital request was September 2011. Between February 2011 and September 2011, the number of cajas has in Spain has dropped from 45 to 17.
 
Put another way, over 60% of cajas could not meet the capital requirements of having equity equal to just 8% of their risk-weighted assets. As a result, 28 toxic caja balance sheets have been merged with other (likely equally troubled) banks or have been shifted onto the public's balance sheet via partial nationalization.
 
On that note, I fully believe the EU in its current form is in its final chapters. Whether it's through Spain imploding or Germany ultimately pulling out of the Euro, we've now reached the point of no return: the problems facing the EU (Spain and Italy) are too large to be bailed out. There simply aren't any funds or entities large enough to handle these issues.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,


Thursday, February 23, 2012

 

Fearless Prediction: On March 20, Greece Will Default

On March 20, Greece has to come up with €14.3 billion—or else it will be bankrupt.

Of course, Greece doesn’t
have €14.3 billion—that’s why the Troika of the IMF, the EC and the ECB are trying to hammer out a deal to bail them out again: A bailout to the tune of €136 billion. They’ve had marathon-length negotiating sessions, one “crucial emergency meeting” after another—hell, they even called the Pope to send them a case of holy water and a truckload of wooden stakes. I’m serious!

Last Monday, a deal
seemed to have emerged: That’s what the announcement sounded like. In fact, it looked so much like a done deal—it was spun so decisively as a done deal—that I was all set to write something snarky like, Greece Takes It Greek Style: “Thank You Troika, May I Have Another” Bailout On Its Way. (What can I say: I’m a vulgar bastard.)

But then . . . then we all started looking at the fine print of the deal. And that’s when everyone who follows this stuff started to realize that the deal
wasn’t a deal—merely the illusion of a deal.

A motto of mine: Never try to do the work someone else has already done for you. In the case of analyzing the Greak “deal”, I turn to John Ward, who pretty much nailed the critique of the deal:
1. [A]lthough the ECB has made a reasonable fist of complicating its subordination of the private bondholders – money out, profits redistributed, local central banks reinvesting and so forth – it remains a preferential deal done outside this so-called ‘bailout with PSI’. The IIF creditors have sort of voluntarily taken the extra 3.5% hit, but the coupon they’ve been offered is worth less than the original. In a statement issued by representatives of private bondholders, the new interest rates – 2% for the first three years, 3% for the next five, and 4.2% thereafter were described as “well below market rates”, and the creditors will lose money on them. The tone of the statement screams ‘involuntary’. In English, all these factors spell default.

2.
Nobody has actually signed up to anything yet: as usual with all things EuroZen, the bankers are alleged to be on-board, but the IIF statement made after the press conference suggests otherwise: ‘We recommend all investors carefully consider the proposed offer, in that it is broadly consistent with the October agreement’. That’s not true for one thing: but as a recommendation, it’s somewhat limp. Further, there is still a body of hardline ezone sovereigns who don’t want to do the deal – and in Germany itself, a growing rearguard campaign to stop it. (See this morning’s Spiegel for immediate evidence). And finally, most Greek citizens themselves will react violently to some of the more pernicious clauses.

3.
The ‘agreement’ contains almost a full bottle of poison pills: Berlin has got its debt Gauleiters in the end, only 19 cents on the euro will go to the Greek Government itself, 325 million euros in additional spending cuts have been found, Athens has agreed to change its constitution to make debt repayment the top priority in government spending, the escrow account must have three months debt money in it at all times etc etc. The idea that Greece can now toddle off and have a liberal democratic general election without any of these being issues is Brussels space-cadet stuff at its most tragi-comic. (An opinion poll taken just before the Brussels deal showed that support for the two Greek parties backing the rescue package had fallen to an all-time low while leftist, anti-bailout parties showed gains.)

4. Several Grand National leaps lie ahead before the default is avoided. Parliaments in three countries that have been most critical of Greece’s second bailout – Germany, the Netherlands and Finland – must now approve the package. In Greece itself, further violence will test political resolve about yet more cuts in wages, pensions and jobs. Greece’s two biggest labour unions have already lined up protests in the capital tomorrow. Very significantly, Jean-Claude Juncker of Luxembourg and the IMF’s Christine Lagarde stressed at the press conference that Greece still had to live up to a series of “prior actions” by the end of the month before eurozone governments or the IMF can sign off on the new programme. If ever I saw a get-out clause, that’s it.


5. Other loose ends are left hanging everywhere. Nobody has elicitied any response so far from the Hedge Fund creditors. Entirely absent from comments was the IMF’s contribution to the €130bn bail-out. Christine Lagarde would say only that the contribution would be ‘significant’, but my information is that she’s lying through her $240,000 teeth as usual: the IMF will only contribute €13bn to the in new Greek funding. Not exactly a resounding vote of confidence for the deal. Juncker said he was optimistic that ezone members would cough up more cash at the EU summit in March, but this too simply doesn’t bear examination: Portugal is broke, Spain is technically insolvent, Italy has asked to be excused from this dance, and Germany has already shown extreme reluctance to to increase its exposure further still. Fritz Schmidt in dem Strasse isn’t too keen either. Finally, as Bruno Waterfield notes in his latest column at the London Daily Telegraph, the agreement remains ‘overshadowed by the pessimistic debt sustainability report compiled by the IMF, ECB and Commission, that warned of a “downside scenario” of Greek debt hitting 160 per cent of GDP in 2020 – far higher that the agreed 120.5 per cent target’.


6. This is where we get to what the MSM will largely dismiss as ‘conspiracy theory’….but for which the circumstantial and corroborative evidence gets increasingly compelling: whole crowd-scenes of actors off-stage (and several on it) simply do not want this deal to reach fruition: they have factored in a Greek default, and believe that the best way to avoid further debt-crisis contagion is for the money earmarked for bailouts to be invested in bank-propping and growth.


The cast of players who think this include David Cameron, Mario Monti, Mario Draghi, Wolfgang Schauble and most of the German Finance ministry, Christine Lagarde, probably Angela Markel herself, Tim Geithner, huge swathes of the German banking community, The White House – and elements in both Beijing and Tokyo.


(
Emphasis added.)
John Ward nails the essence of the Greek deal: There is no Greek deal—just the illusion of one.

My only quibble with Mr. Ward is his point 6.: He writes that “whole crowd-scenes of actors off-stage (and several on it) simply do not want this deal to reach fruition”, which I think is accurate—but not for the reason Mr. Ward posits: I think the eurocrats have given up on Greece
not because they “believe that the best way to avoid further debt-crisis contagion is for the money earmarked for bailouts to be invested in bank-propping and growth,” as Mr. Ward writes.

Mr. Ward is making a smart financial analysis of the situation. But the big decisions in macro-economics are
never financial: They are always political—always. And politics is ultimately about psychology.

I think the eurocrats won’t bail out Greece not because they believe letting Greece default is the best way to avoid contagion: No, I believe the eurocrats will let Greece default because
they no longer trust the Greeks or the Greek leadership.

Trust is like virginity: Once you lose it, it’s gone for good. Add to that truism a basic observation: If two parties truly want to make a deal happen, then the deal happens as if it’s on rails.


The key players of the Troika and the eurodrones generally just don’t trust Greece anymore. The Greeks have burned through that particular capital a long time ago. And by the passive-aggressive negotiation style of the eurocrats, they’re making it crystal clear that
they do not want a deal with Greece. If they truly wanted a deal, it would’ve happened by now.

They don’t want a deal because the eurocrats and Establishment drones charged with saving Greece—for all their obvious flaws—are neither stupid nor blind: They realize that Greece is in all likelihood a never-ending hole. Whatever deal they hammer out now, they’ll have to hammer out yet another bailout package in 12 to 24 months’ time.


They realize—even if they don’t want to or can’t articulate it—that saving Greece is simply throwing good money after bad.


So they won’t. They will let Greece default. And the way they will do that is by demanding such egregious conditions—such as giving up Greek sovereignty—that Greece will refuse the bailout, or get locked into more and more negotiations, until March 20 finally rolls around.


Then it’s game over for the Greeks: They will default, exit the eurozone, go to the drachma, devalue, and go through hell for a few years.


It has now become too expensive—financially, politically, psychologically—to save Greece. The holes in the Monday deal show that
there is no deal—and there won’t be any deal.

So on March 20, Greece defaults.


Now . . . if Greece defaults . . . then what about the rest of the eurozone?


Ahhh
: That is the real question.

Labels: , , , ,


Friday, January 13, 2012

 

EU Central Banks Are Already Preparing For a Euro Breakup

It is now clear that the Euro will be broken up
in the coming months.

Consider the following statement from Italy's largest bank:


Euro break-up cited as risk in UniCredit prospectus


UniCredit, Italy's largest bank by assets, has cited the

break-up of the euro zone and the collapse of the single
currency as risk factors in the prospectus of its 7.5
billion euro rights issue.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/05/unicredit-ceo-euro-idUSL6E8C547I20120105


Or how about this one straight from two German lawmakers:

Greek Euro Exit Weighed By German Lawmakers, Seen as Manageable


Lawmakers from Chancellor Angela Merkel's party are

stepping up pressure on Greece as it struggles to meet
the terms of its second bailout, saying that a Greek exit
from the euro region would be manageable.

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-01-12/greek-euro-exit-weighed-by-german-lawmakers-seen-as-manageable.html#1_undefined,0_


There are simply stunning comments coming out of

VERY high level sources in Europe. Remember,
as much as Merkel talks about maintaining the Euro,
she needs German lawmakers to back her on that
decision.

And that simply isn't going to happen. The German

courts and German voters simply won't stand for it.

So while Merkel and Sarkozy talk time and again about

solving this situation, the fact remains that moves are
already being made behind the scenes to prepare for
the end of the Euro.

This is not mere conjecture. Numerous EU central

banks have already begun preparing for the possibilty
of printing their old currencies again. Germany is one
of the countries doing this by the way.

In plain terms, the Euro in its current form is finished.

When it breaks up we will see widespread defaults
across the EU. And what follows will make 2008 look
like a joke.

So if you have not already taken steps to prepare for the next

round of Euro Crisis... you need to do so now!
Once the Euro breakup is announced it will be too late
as panicked selling pushes the market into collapse.

Many people will see their portfolios destroyed by this.

Now is the time to make sure you're not one of them.
I can show you how. Indeed, few investors can match
my ability to make profits out of a Crisis.

Labels: , , , ,


Tuesday, December 13, 2011

 

European Corporations Are Preparing For the End of the Euro

One of the biggest problems facing the world today is the fact that most world leaders have little if any business experience. Those who do are inevitably investment bankers/ financiers who, while technically businessmen, have expertise primarily in financial engineering, NOT manufacturing goods or services that create actual job growth.

With that in mind, when analyzing what's happening in Europe, it's wise to consider what ACTUAL businesspeople are doing today with their corporations' cash rather than what leaders are claiming is true about the financial system.

Case in point, every other week we are told that Europe's problems will soon be solved and that the EU will be stronger then ever. If this is indeed the case, I wonder about the following story:

European CEOs Move Cash to Germany In Case of Euro Breakup

Grupo Gowex, a Spanish provider of Wi-Fi wireless services, is moving funds to Germany because it expects Spain to exit the euro. German machinery maker GEA Group AG is setting maximum amounts held at any one bank...

"A couple of weeks ago I would never have thought about having conversations on the probability of the euro disappearing, but now there is more speculation on such a scenario," Wolters Kluwer NV (WKL) CEO Nancy McKinstry said in a Nov. 29 interview at the company's headquarters outside Amsterdam...

Kingfisher Plc (KGF), Europe's largest home-improvement retailer, has considered plans for the possibility of a collapse of the euro region and will focus on cash generation to account for that possibility, Chief Executive Officer Ian Cheshire said.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-09/wary-european-ceos-move-cash-to-germany-to-protect-against-breakup-risk.html

These are REAL businesspeople who RUN corporations, preparing for the breakup of the Euro by moving their cash to Germany. Read the above article: it features executives from companies throughout Europe all of whom state they are preparing for a Crisis and the potential of a Euro breakup.

And if you think that politicians have somehow solved the banking crisis... read the following:

Eurozone banking system on the edge of collapse

If anyone thinks things are getting better then they simply don't understand how severe the problems are. I think a major bank could fail within weeks," said one London-based executive at a major global bank.

Many banks, including some French, Italian and Spanish lenders, have already run out of many of the acceptable forms of collateral such as US Treasuries and other liquid securities used to finance short-term loans and have been forced to resort to lending out their gold reserves to maintain access to dollar funding.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/8947470/Eurozone-banking-system-on-the-edge-of-collapse.html

If a bank has to resort to lending out GOLD reserves in order to get DOLLAR funding so it can maintain liquidity... then it's on its deathbed. And this is happening in France, Italy and Spain RIGHT NOW.

It's time we admit the truth, the EU and its banking system are literally on the edge of collapse. Think 2008... for an entire region. And politicians are going to solve this mess with a March 2012 meeting!?!

The impact of what's coming will be TREMENDOUS. Europe's banking system is over $40 trillion in size. The EU, taken as a whole, is:

1) The single largest economy in the world ($16.28 trillion)

2) Is China's largest trade partner

3) Accounts for 21% of US exports

4) Accounts for $121 billion worth of exports for South America

So if the EU banking system/ economy collapses, the global economy could enter a recession just based on that one issue alone (ignoring the other issues in China, Japan, and the US).

Make no mistake, we're heading into a Crisis that will make 2008 look like a picnic. If you've yet to prepare for this, I suggest you do so now.

Labels: , , , , ,


Thursday, December 08, 2011

 

Read This and Tell Me Germany Will Remain in the Euro

I've stated before that I fully believe Germany will be leaving the Euro. With that in mind, I want to draw your attention to recent comments from Germany's finance minister, Wolfgang Schauble.

Wolfgang Schauble admits euro bail-out fund won't halt crisis

Europe's "big bazooka" bail-out fund is not ready and won't stem the debt crisis that on Tuesday pounded Italy and the European Central Bank (ECB), admitted Wolfgang Schauble, Germany's finance minister.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financialcrisis/8924462/Wolfgang-Schauble-admits-euro-bail-out-fund-wont-halt-crisis.html

This is a pretty strong admission from the finance minister of the country that Europe looks to as a financial backstop. And the following is even more disconcerting for the future of the Euro:

Seeing in Crisis the Last Best Chance to Unite Europe

MR. SCHÄUBLE said the German government would propose treaty changes at the summit of European leaders in Brussels on Dec. 9 that would move Europe closer to the centralized fiscal government that the currency zone has lacked. The ultimate goal, Mr. Schäuble says, is a political union with a European president directly elected by the people.

"What we're now doing with the fiscal union, what I'm describing here, is a short-term step for the currency," Mr. Schäuble said. "In a larger context, naturally we need a political union."

Critics say the spending cuts German leaders have demanded from other countries are hurting growth across the Continent, in the process making debts only harder to repay. And his proposals to give the European Commission far-reaching powers to enforce budgetary discipline have been likened by skeptics in Britain to an invasive new "super state." Even some euro supporters fear that Mrs. Merkel and Mr. Schäuble are talking about long-term changes while panicked investors and practiced speculators are tearing the euro to pieces right now.

"There is a limited transition period where we have to manage the nervousness on the markets," Mr. Schäuble said. "If it is clear that by the end of 2012 or the middle of 2013 that we have all the ingredients for new, strengthened and deepened political structures together, I think that will work."

He sees the turmoil as not an obstacle but a necessity. "We can only achieve a political union if we have a crisis," Mr. Schäuble said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/19/world/europe/for-wolfgang-schauble-seeing-opportunity-in-europes-crisis.html?_r=1&pagewanted=2

Note that Schauble repeatedly emphasizes the goal of a "political union," NOT a "fiscal union" or "monetary union." Indeed, his one reference to a "fiscal union" is in the "short-term," while stressing that in a "larger context" the EU needs a "political union."

The message here is very, very clear: Germany is interested in the EU as a political entity, NOT the Euro as a currency. With that in mind, consider the following story which received almost NO attention from the media:

-German Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservatives on Monday passed a resolution at a party convention urging the government to establish rules in Europe that would allow a country to voluntarily leave the euro zone without giving up membership in the European Union.

The resolution reads:

"Should a member [of the euro zone] be unable or unwilling to permanently obey the rules connected to the common currency he will be able to voluntarily--according to the rules of the Lisbon Treaty for leaving the European Union--leave the euro zone without leaving the European Union. He would receive the same status as those member states that do not have the euro."

http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20111114-712771.html

I fully believe that Germany is laying the groundwork for it to leave the Euro while still remaining a member of the EU. The alternative to this would be for Germany to demand other nations give up their fiscal sovereignty and make Germany a kind of monetary authority in exchange for additional bailouts. However, the likelihood of this option being presented is next to ZERO as ALL of Europe remembers WWII and the threat of German rule.

So I expect Germany to duck out of the Euro in the near future. It may happen in the next few weeks or it may happen in early 2012. But considering that the Federal Reserve had to step in to save the European banking system today I believe it will be sooner rather than later.

So if you believe that Germany is going to save the EU... you're in for a rude surprise. Indeed, if we look at the bond or credit markets, it's clear we're into a Crisis far greater than 2008. Forget the stock market rally. Stocks ALWAYS get it last (just like in 2008). And before the smoke clears on this mess we're going to see sovereign defaults, bank holidays, riots, and more.

Many people will lose everything in this mess. Yes, everything. However, you don't have to be one of them. Indeed, I can show you how to turn this time of collapse into a time of profits.

Labels: , , , ,


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?